World Schools Debate

Ready
0:00
What is flowing? Flowing is how judges take notes during a debate round — tap to learn more

Flowing is the note-taking method used in debate. Each speech gets its own column, and you write arguments vertically down the page. When a debater responds to an argument, you write the response in the next column across from the original argument — so you can see the back-and-forth.

World Schools Speech Structure:

Speech Time Who Speaks
1st Proposition8 minProposition — Speaker 1
1st Opposition8 minOpposition — Speaker 1
2nd Proposition8 minProposition — Speaker 2
2nd Opposition8 minOpposition — Speaker 2
3rd Proposition8 minProposition — Speaker 3
3rd Opposition8 minOpposition — Speaker 3
Opposition Reply4 minOpposition — Speaker 1 or 2
Proposition Reply4 minProposition — Speaker 1 or 2

Tips for this tool:

• World Schools uses Points of Information (POIs) instead of cross-examination. Debaters may rise to offer a POI during the other side's speeches. POIs are protected in the first and last minute of each substantive speech.

• There is no prep time — for prepared motions, teams receive the topic in advance. For impromptu motions, teams get 1 hour before the round.

• The 8 columns below correspond to the 8 speeches. Type notes in the active (highlighted) column as that speech happens.

• Each side has 3 substantive speakers (columns 1–6) who build and clash with arguments, plus a reply speaker (columns 7–8) who summarizes and crystallizes.

• The 1st speakers (columns 1–2) define the debate and lay out each side's core case.

• The 2nd speakers (columns 3–4) are often the "rebuttal" speakers — they clash directly with the other side's arguments while extending their own.

• The 3rd speakers (columns 5–6) are the "whip" speakers — they identify the key issues in the round and explain why their side is winning on each.

• The reply speeches (columns 7–8) are given by the 1st or 2nd speaker (not the 3rd). They provide a biased adjudication — a summary of the round from their side's perspective. No new arguments allowed.

• Note: the Opposition replies first, then Proposition — the reverse of the main speeches. This gives Proposition the last word.

• Note any POIs in the flow column of the speech during which they occur.

• Use abbreviations freely — "P" for Proposition, "O" for Opposition, "→" for "leads to", etc. Only you need to read these.

• If one side doesn't answer an argument, leave a gap — that's called a "drop" and it usually counts against them.

• Use Ctrl+→ to advance to the next speech, or tap the speech pills above.

Spacebar starts/stops the timer (when you're not typing in a flow area).

Teams

P1
P2
P3
O1
O2
O3

Winner

Prop
Opp

Speaker Points

P1 1st Prop 25–30
P2 2nd Prop 25–30
P3 3rd Prop 25–30
O1 1st Opp 25–30
O2 2nd Opp 25–30
O3 3rd Opp 25–30
Speaker Points Guide

Speaker points reflect how well each debater spoke, separate from who won. Average is roughly 28.5–29.2. Score each debater individually.

In debate, it's common practice to not score below 26 — even a struggling debater showed up, prepared, and competed, which deserves a baseline of respect. Scores below 26 are reserved for conduct issues and require notifying the tournament.

29.5 – 30Exceptional — hard to imagine a better speaker
29.1 – 29.4Consistently excellent throughout
28.8 – 29.0Effective and strategic, only minor mistakes
28.3 – 28.7Hit the right notes but could improve in depth or efficiency
27.8 – 28.2Mostly on track but left something to be desired
27.3 – 27.7Missed major arguments, hard to follow
27.0 – 27.2Accomplished little in the debate
26.0 – 26.9Struggled significantly to finish the round
Below 26Reserved for offensive, rude, or dishonest conduct — must notify tab

Reason for Decision (RFD)

Judge Assistance

Speech-by-speech coaching tips
"What is flowing?" guide on flow page

Speech Times

Theme

Appearance

Data